BaFin, Germany’s regulatory body for Financial Instruments, has proposed a “case-by-case” approach when dealing with Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs).
On March 8, BaFin (the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) journal released an explanatory note regarding the legal classification of NFTs. At present, the regulator maintains that Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs) fail to demonstrate characteristics similar to securities like stocks, thus making it impossible to being classified as securities in a regulatory sense.
In the Statement the regulator wrote “If NFTs are to be classified as securities under the EU Prospectus Regulation or as investments under the Asset Investments Act ( VermAnlG ), a prospectus must always be prepared.”
“NFTs are classified as securities if they embody rights similar to securities, are transferable and can be traded on the financial market. Security-like rights include membership rights or contractual claims of a material nature, similar to stocks and debt instruments.”
Nonetheless, BaFin does not rule out that I may consider NFTs as securities in the future, if, for example, “1,000 NFTs are linked to the same repayment and interest claims”. But given the challenges of categorization, BaFin has made it clear that Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) are exempt from licensing requirements.
It may, be considered an investment, if an NFT includes evidence of rights of ownership or usage such as a guarantee of distribution. Therefore, BaFin has suggested a case-by-case approach when considering classifying NFTs as a “crypto asset”.
However, due to the absence of immediate exchangeability, the likelihood of NFTs being labelled as a “crypto asset” is less than that of an investment. Additionally, the lack of standardization absolves NFTs from being classified as “e-money”.
Further, due to the challenges associated with categorization, the BaFin does not anticipate NFTs to adhere to the Payment Services Supervision Act’s licensing requirements. Non-fungible tokens are exempt from BaFin’s Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations, with the exception of fungible tokens that are categorized as financial instruments. Crypto assets which are separately evaluated as NFTs would still have to abide by AML supervision.
An Analysis of the Metajuice metaverse platform shows that nearly three-quarters of collectors on the platform purchase NFTs for reasons such as status, uniqueness, and aesthetics. Only 13% of those surveyed said that they buy NFTs with the intention of reselling them in the future.
European Nations Approach to Non-Fungible Tokens in Stark Contrast to Other Countries
In the Eurozone, it seems that countries are taking a different approach to Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) than countries like the United States, Singapore, and India.
The German regulators approach is in stark contrast to the actions taken by the US, India, Singapore, and Israel,
Only last year, the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) changed how it classified NFTs, categorizing them as digital assets and releasing guidance for the 2022 tax year.
In April 2022, India amended its policy on virtual asset ownership to include a 30% tax on NFTs.
Meanwhile, Singapore indicated that any profits from the sale of an NFT would be added to an individual’s personal income for taxation, while Israel implemented a capital gains tax.
According to BaFin, though, categorizing NFTs as securities necessitates more than just the rationale for imposing a tax.
Birgit Rodolphe, the executive director of the German financial regulatory agency BaFin, has called for a unified and innovative regulation of the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector across the European Union.
The BaFin (German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority)
The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) is the governing body responsible for ensuring the safety and soundness of the banking and financial services industry in Germany. As such, BaFin has the authority to grant licenses, including the “crypto custody license” which is necessary for businesses to offer Bitcoin services or other digital assets within Germany.
BaFin works in collaboration with other regulatory agencies from both EU Member States and third countries in regards to the supervisory roles it is assigned in Part 16 of the WpHG, especially with regards to the investigation of potential breaches of periodic financial reporting requirements (including accounting standards).
Where European Union law has harmonised securities trading law, this cooperation is regulated in detail and necessitates the relevant bodies to work together and give each other mutual support in the cross-border investigation of issues and the prosecution of potential breaches. This network of agencies in the different Member States works together in order to effectively supervise the EU’s internal market for financial services.
English